Guardian, UK Legal maze Geoffrey Gibbs on how Wales could stop commercial GM crops in the UK before they get off the ground Wednesday March 15, 2000 As the government prepares this week to unveil details of proposed farmscale trials of three GM crops across the UK, pressure is mounting on the Labour administration in Wales to strike a first blow in the campaign to turn the country into a GM-free zone. The move could put the devolved administration in conflict with Westminster and poses a tricky dilemma for the Welsh agriculture secretary, Christine Gwyther, who may be damned from Downing Street if she does and will be damned in Wales if she doesn't. At the heart of the issue is an application by the biotech company, Aventis, for its T25 forage maize to be included on the UK national seed list. Approval is the final regulatory barrier to be crossed before seeds can be grown commercially. And although the biotech industry has agreed a moratorium on commercial growing until farm-scale trials have been completed and assessed in 2003, campaigners believe it is vital to take a stand and block the application now. They claim that Wales, where feelings against GM trials run high, has an effective veto because the application has to be approved jointly by ministers in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. The decision rests in the hands of Gwyther, who less than six months ago was censured by opposition members of the national assembly over her handling of the crisis affecting the farming industry in Wales. Members of the assembly's agriculture and rural affairs committee - on which Labour is in a minority - have been given the opportunity to debate the matter and offer advice because of what the agriculture secretary has acknowledged is the widespread public interest in GM issues. Gwyther herself is known to believe that Wales would benefit from being able to present itself to the world as a GM-free area. But she has warned the committee that her decision has to be made on a lawful basis. Although initial legal advice from the office of the counsel general suggested there were no legal grounds on which to refuse the Aventis application, Gwyther has agreed to defer her decision until the agriculture committee has had the opportunity to study legal submissions from Friends of the Earth, which challenges that opinion. The committee, which has signalled that it favours blocking the application, is also keen to study further scientific papers and will meet again at the end of this month to deliver its advice. Gwyther is not bound to accept the committee's recommendation, but overriding it is certain to stir up a storm of protest both within the assembly and without. "The reaction would be very hostile," says Gordon James, head of campaigns for Friends of the Earth Cymru. "It would fuel the feeling that the assembly is simply rubber stamping what Blair wants. There would be extreme concern and anger that the voice of the elected representatives of Wales is not being listened to and that we are caving into Westminster." According to Gwyther, T25 maize, which was targeted by protesters during trials in England last summer, has already received health and environmental clearances and has completed trials showing it meets the criteria of suitability for agricultural cultivation. But FoE Cymru claims the risk assessment processes under which the GM maize gained approval two years ago are no longer considered adequate either by the UK goverment or by the EU. "This maize is intended for cattle, yet there have been no safety assessments for animals eating GM feed," says the organisation's GM campaigner, Raoul Bhambral. "It's shocking that we don't seem to have learned from the last animal feed scare." The group has sought to add weight to its campaign in Wales by taking independent legal advice, which, it argues, confirms that the national assembly has the power to refuse consent for a GM crop if it is unable to conclude with confidence that the crop would not harm human health or the environment and provided it remains prepared to consider representations to the contrary. A spokesman for the agriculture secretary confirmed it would be considered carefully, in conjunction with other advice, before Gwyther makes her decision. Whichever way that goes, she can expect to face flak and a legal challenge from the disappointed parties. As she has discovered since being propelled into the cabinet by the former first secretary, Alun Michael, the position of agriculture secretary is one of the hottest political potatoes around.